CHAPTER 31 Systems thinking
نویسنده
چکیده
Systems thinking is one form that interdisciplinarity has adopted since the middle of the twentieth century. It is a catchall term for different postwar developments in a variety of fi elds, such as cybernetics, information theory, game and decision theory, automaton theory, systems engineering, and operations research. These developments concur, however , inasmuch as, in one way or another, they relate to a basic reorientation in scientifi c thinking attempting to overcome ever-increasing specialization, and trying to make a shift from reductionist to holistic thinking, while acknowledging the unity of reality and the interconnections between its different parts and aspects. There have been a number of attempts to defi ne interdisciplinarity and identify its different types. Of particular interest in the present case is Margaret Boden (1999), who distinguishes six forms ranging from weak to strong: encyclopedic, contextualizing, sharing, cooperative , generalizing, and integrative types of interdisciplinarity. Encyclopedic interdisciplinar-ity requires no exchange or sharing between any disciplines involved, whereas integrative interdisciplinarity demands rigorous interaction. The latter is thus, according to Boden, the most genuine kind of interdisciplinarity as 'an enterprise in which some of the concepts and insights of one discipline contribute to the problems and theories of another—preferably in both directions'. Artifi cial intelligence (AI), a fi eld in which Boden has a scholarly reputation, is in her view an excellent example of integrated interdisciplinarity. Each of the main types of AI, traditional or symbolic AI, connectionism, and 'nouvelle AI' , has borrowed concepts from other disciplines such as philosophy, logic, psychology, and neurophysiology. How does systems thinking fi t into this typology? Boden labels the proposal for a 'gen-eral systems theory' that was launched by Ludwig von Bertalanffy and others in the middle of the twentieth century and Norbert Wiener's closely related idea of cybernetics as examples of 'generalizing interdisciplinarity' , defi ned as 'an enterprise in which a single theoretical perspective is applied to a wide range of previously distinct disciplines'. Also the more recent developments in the area of complexity studies can be regarded as an example of this type. Boden (1999, p. 20) correctly notes that it is no accident that these examples are all heavily mathematical: 'The abstractness of mathematics enables it to be applied, in principle, to all other disciplines' .
منابع مشابه
LITERATURE DISCUSSION GROUPS 1 LITERATURE DISCUSSION GROPUPS AND READING COMPREHENSION by Holly Tugman SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTERS IN ARTS IN EDUCATION
4 Chapter I: Introduction 5 Statement of the Problem 6 Research Questions 6 Chapter II: Review of Literature 7 Theoretical Framework 7 Implementing Literature Discussion Groups 9 Talk about the text 12 Small group discussion is better than whole class 15 Students can learn in student-led discussion 19 Literature Discussion Group Effects on Comprehension 23 Comprehension strategies influence und...
متن کاملSystems of Systems: Pure, and Applied to Lean Six Sigma
This chapter will briefly introduce the principles of General Systems Thinking (GST) as defined by classic literature on the subject (Ackoff, 1971; Battista, 1977; Bertalanffy, 1968; Boulding, 1956; Churchman, 1968; Waelchi, 1992; Weinburg, 1975). In particular, this chapter will contrast two opposing operational research (OR) views about systems thinking; the ‘reductionistic’ (‘hard’) approach...
متن کاملAssessing the Capacity for Engineering Systems Thinking (CEST) and Other Competencies of Systems Engineers
This chapter introduces a tool for assessing engineers' interest in what is required from successful systems engineers, or in other words, assessing the extent of engineers' systems thinking. What is required from successful systems engineers (the characteristics of successful systems engineers) is commonly called 'competencies of successful systems engineers' and much activity to develop syste...
متن کاملSystems Thinking as a Platform for the Improved Performance of Leaders and the Effectiveness of Public Organizations
The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of systems thinking on the performance of leaders of public organizations in Tehran and the effectiveness of their organizations. It was an applied, descriptive and correlational research. The statistical population of the study consisted of all public organizations in Tehran. According to Morgan's table, the sample size was 80. Data were c...
متن کاملBuilding Schemata for Tax Provision Learning Based On Cognitive Load Theory and Constructivism
ix CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER II: BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESES 7 2.1 Building Schemata in Tax Provision Novices 7 2.2 Background on Tax Provisions 7 2.3 Cognitive Load Theory 9 2.3.1 Background on Cognitive Load and Working Memory 9 2.3.2 How Systems-Thinking Methodology Reduces Cognitive Load 12 2.4 Constructivist Learning 13 2.4.1 Background on Constructivist Learning 14 2.4.2 Constructiv...
متن کاملDesigning E-Government Platforms using Systems Thinking Perspectives and Performance Measurement Frameworks
This chapter intends to present information systems philosophies on design of affluent e-Government platform design. The chapter looks at e-Government platform design in two ways. First, it looks at it as a prevailing concept and philosophy that emanate through the combination of literature in the academic disciplines of government and governance, ICT and information society, and e-Business. He...
متن کامل